Thursday, March 31, 2011

Sexually active women in their 60s? Spare me | Michele Hanson

I wish Sigourney Weaver would shut up. Many of us may be thanking God that we need never be fagged with all that stuff again

Jennifer Garner, aged 38, is to play the elderly lady detective in the new Disney version of Miss Marple. Grazia magazine is furious. But it's not much of a surprise. There is no sex in the existing Miss Marple films, and that's what you need to get people out to the cinema. Tonnes of sex, glamour and violence. That's why old women don't get many parts in films. They don't often do sex, fights and conventional beauty. But it doesn't have to be like this. Just ask Sigourney Weaver (below), who plays a sort of Mrs Robinson part in Cedar Rapids (coming out in April), and feels that "women in their 60s can still be attractive and sexually active". Basic qualifications for big film parts.

I wish Sigourney would shut up. She might be keen on all that, but many women in their 60s may be thanking God that all that stuff is over, they need never be fagged with it again, and they certainly don't want to be glaring at Sigourney, or anyone else, being "sexually active" all over the big screen. I've always found it frightfully embarrassing. I have to go and make the tea if that sort of thing starts up. But neither do we want to be staring at the original Miss Marple, unless we're nearly dead and home in the afternoons, or at the new glam Disney version, because now we know better. Anyway, we have the best female detective ever now: Sophie Gr�b�l as Sarah Lund in The Killing, and she has absolutely no time to be attractive and sexually active.

All right, she's not elderly, but she is female and star of the best detective series ever, she wears a normal woolly (well, it was until she wore it), and she has made it hip and breathtakingly thrilling to stay in on Saturday nights, which is what old women often do, and my hope is that in 30 years, when I will have fallen off my perch, The Killing will still be going, with Gr�b�l in it, possibly doing cold cases, at 60-plus.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2011/apr/01/sexually-active-women-60s-michele-hanson

Chalkboards Canada Madagascar Yorkshire Sepp Blatter Local government

How much leverage does the tea party really have? | Michael Tomasky

The latest from Capitol Hill is that there is an agreement in principle on a budget that would cut $33 billion from domestic spending.

It must be noted that the agreement so far is only on the target figure, not the actual cuts. But assuming they get there, that's an amount of money that a few weeks ago Democrats like Harry Reid were saying was utterly unacceptable. But now it's the deal. That sounds like a Republican win to me.

The tea-party element, naturally, does not look at it that way at all. from Dana Milbank's WashPost column today:

A band of the first-term members of Congress demonstrated their legislative maturity Wednesday by announcing, in a news conference outside the Capitol, that they wished to deliver a message to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. But rather than merely send him an e-mail or hire a courier, the lawmakers instead marched up the East Front steps and presented themselves at a seldom-used ceremonial door.

Being a ceremonial door, it was locked and alarmed ? and so the freshmen used two strips of their blue tape to affix the letter, enclosed in a large manila envelope with the words "MR. REID" handwritten in four-inch letters.

"We're doing our job in the House of Representatives," announced Rep. Vicky Hartzler (R-Mo.), a member of the blue-tape brigade. "We put forth a proposal that would cut $61 billion .?.?. and yet Senator Reid won't even, uh, consider that. That is dereliction of duty."

As Milbank notes, in fact, Reid brought that very figure to the Senate floor, where it failed by a vote of 56-44.

From Politico, we receive the intelligence that the tea-party sympathetic members of the GOP House caucus plan on holding a rally today featuring "perhaps hundreds" (horrors!) of participants. These include the usual suspects: Michele Bachmann, Steve King, Mike Pence. And how many others?

That's the question: can the tea-party-ish members block a deal?

We can't know the answer yet because it depends in part on how many Democrats back the deal. My guess would be that most Democrats in the House would vote for it in the end, because that will be the White House position, and members don't want the uncertainty of a shutdown (which side will be blamed, what its effects might be on the economy).

If I'm right about that, then it would need a very large bloc of right-wing members to nix a deal, and I don't think they quite have those numbers. So let's say they lose this one. What next?

Then comes the debt-ceiling vote. But the way things look right now (and this could change), it looks like they'd lose that one, too. So then the interesting question will become, where does the tea party go. This will have an impact on the GOP presidential primaries, in all likelihood, and probably not a good one from the point of view of Republican electability.

Maybe I'm getting ahead of myself here. But this kind of politics is about votes and leverage, and the simple truth appears to be that they don't have quite enough of either. They'll become angrier and angrier. I don't feel like the Democrats have played this particularly well; substantively, remember, they are giving ground they said they'd never give. But politically, the bigger headache in the long run will be the GOP's.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://feeds.guardian.co.uk/~r/theguardian/commentisfree/rss/~3/qNcNz36RRbw/obama-administration-congress-tea-partys-leverage

Restaurants Dubai Andrew Cole Banking Allied Irish Banks CancĂșn climate change conference 2010 | COP16

Houllier insists he has Lerner's backing

? Manager says he has confidence of owner Randy Lerner
? Frenchman denies player revolt over alleged new rules

G�rard Houllier believes that he retains the complete backing of the Aston Villa chairman, Randy Lerner, despite the club's precarious position one point above the relegation zone and mounting unrest from the supporters.

The Villa manager was in defiant mood ahead of Saturday's game at Everton and insisted that he does not feel under any pressure. He spoke of his unwavering belief in his methods as well as his confidence that the players at his disposal have the talent and mental strength to drag the club clear of the bottom three. The Frenchman said stories of player mutiny because of alleged changes to a club rulebook were "completely untrue".

Although there is a sense that the next two fixtures ? Newcastle visit Villa Park a week on Sunday ? are critical, Houllier has no doubt that Lerner is behind him. Asked whether the chairman's support was as strong ever, he replied: "I think so. In fact I'm convinced of that. I speak to Randy on a regular basis and I speak also to Paul [Faulkner, the chief executive] at least once every day, so we are very close and very tight together. We know what we are going through and we know that we need the forces of everybody. And I think the team knows that. It's important to be in a club where there is strong belief and trust in them."

Houllier said that the key to survival is galvanising everyone connected with the club and he warned that any player not buying into that approach will be moved on. "If someone is not with us and is not giving more than 100%, he's got to leave because he won't make it," he said. "[But] I think we are all right. The spirit is good, we know where the land lies; we're not lying to ourselves, we are in relegation battle."

Houllier has been forced to deal with a number of off-field issues during his six-month reign but he rejected suggestions that he has implemented a new code of conduct in the wake of the fracas involving Richard Dunne and James Collins a fortnight ago that has led to senior players rebelling. "That is absolutely untrue. You can even ask the players," Houllier said. "I didn't mention anything even after the incident [with Dunne and Collins].

"Regarding the mobile phones, I spoke about this the first day I came and that was it. They're very reasonable because there is no mobile phone used in the changing room and I don't go and check. And I've never put a fine on a player who's been late. I hate fines. The second thing is that the set of rules is something that was given by the PFA [Professional Footballers' Association]. I was not even aware of that. And it was given before the Bolton game [on 5 March] because they needed to make a change because they needed the doctor's name and his mobile number."


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/mar/31/gerard-houllier-aston-villa

Sweden International criminal justice Endangered species Tottenham Hotspur Psychology Work & careers

Grieg: Piano Concerto; Ballade in G minor; Piano Sonata, etc

Sl�ttebrekk/Grieg/Oslo PO/Jurowski

This is a puzzling set. In 1903 in Paris Edvard Grieg made a set of wax-cylinder recordings of his own piano music ? some of the Lyric Pieces, two movements of his E minor sonata ? which remain important historical documents, but which suffer from the limitations of the early recording process. The performances by Sigurd Sl�tterbrekk stem from a forensic examination of those recordings, during which every nuance of Grieg's playing was studied. Sl�tterbrekk then recorded not only the same works as Grieg, but the remaining movements of the sonata and the G minor Ballade, using the composer's Steinway, attempting to come as close as possible to Grieg's performances, which are also included in the set. The Piano Concerto was recorded on a modern instrument but following the principles established from the early recordings, and using the cadenza that Percy Grainger composed for it in 1908. It seems a bizarre exercise; Sl�ttebrekk's playing is accomplished enough, his account of the concerto fine, but I'm not convinced that the musicological baggage that comes with them makes them anything more.

Rating: 3/5


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2011/mar/31/grieg-sigurd-slatterbrekk-piano-concerto

Canary Islands Australasia Private equity Regulators Labour Supermarkets

Kenny Dalglish knows Liverpool 'progress' must not be allowed to stall | Paul Hayward

Luis Su�rez and Andy Carroll have livened up Anfield but the Liverpool manager realises more is needed ? and securing his own future is just as important a step as signing the strikers

Luis Su�rez is a hit, Fernando Torres a flop so far at Chelsea and Andy Carroll has scored his first England goal. No wonder "progress" is the mantra at Anfield as Kenny Dalglish prepares to take Liverpool to West Bromwich Albion, where Roy Hodgson found refuge from the swirl of blame that blew him away from Merseyside.

Liverpool's coup in attracting Su�rez and Carroll was surely the greatest zero-balance transfer trade in Premier League history. Out went the trudging and disaffected Torres (and Ryan Babel) and in came a Uruguayan with electrifying spacial awareness and a kind of Alan Shearer on steroids who could yet restore the standing of the giant English No9.

Carroll was not answering the call of the Mersey so much as the desire of his loss-making hometown club to snatch the �35m before Liverpool ceased to be cash-rich from the Torres deal. But Su�rez appears to have been motivated by an authentic urge to become a Liverpool player, which shows in his play. He ignored the Premier League table. Will others, this summer, and in January? These are the two big windows on John W Henry's ownership.

All the talk of recovery is music to the Kop. For it to be sustained, though, Liverpool will have to cull again this summer and attract the kind of player who may reasonably look at their final league position and balk if it fails to offer continental action. Dalglish ? assuming his contract is sorted out ? and Damien Comolli, who has a lot to prove as the newly promoted director of football, already know they will not be able to entice recruits with the promise of great Champions League nights at Anfield.

So Liverpool are a hard sell, for 12 months at least, but Su�rez and Carroll certainly brighten up the brochure at a club where the goalscoring department had tumbleweeds blowing through it before the sale of Torres came to feel less like a tragedy than a catharsis.

The England setup is not somewhere the average Liverpool fan looks to for inspiration (many decline to look at it at all) but the sight of Carroll scoring against Ghana revived the hope on Merseyside that he will cause damage in the eight league games the club have left. "It is a great reward for his recuperation and it will give him a lift and kick him on further," Dalglish says. "He's got a wee bit to go before getting up to match fitness but he came in here for five and a half years, not two months."

Dalglish also insisted Carroll was "focused" on his task, rather than his pint, three days after Fabio Capello, the England manager, had warned him to drink less beer. King Kenny will recognise that kind of missive from his own playing days, when heroes were thirstier than they are allowed to be today, but he also appreciates Carroll's symbolic importance, as the most expensive English footballer, and the author of the biggest footprint on the road to recovery.

The clearing out of stowaways will freshen the air again this summer: players such as Ins�a, Degen, El Zhar and Konchesky, who are all on loan. A measure of progress is that Lucas Leiva, a bete noire to many before this campaign, has improved dramatically and signed a contract extension. Steven Gerrard is on the way back and could feature at West Brom. Milan Jovanovic, a Rafael Ben�tez fancy who arrived in the short Hodgson era, will be shipped back out. Pepe Reina talks as if he wants to leave. Keeping the star goalkeeper is the biggest challenge within the existing squad.

A promising hardcore is in place: Reina, Gerrard, Jamie Carragher, Glen Johnson, Lucas, Raul Meireles, Carroll, Su�rez and Dirk Kuyt, who runs his legs into stumps. But it is far too small to sustain a title challenge, which is what makes the summer pivotal. Inside Anfield, though, they will tell you the financial outlook has been transformed by the club not having to dish out interest on the takeover debt piled up by Tom Hicks and George Gillett.

All of which leaves the biggest issue unresolved: Dalglish's contract, and the demarcation lines between the manager and Comolli, the Minister for Moneyball in the new cabinet. The owners may take the view that extending Dalglish's deal is unnecessary before the season's end but the football industry is not keen on hesitation.

Already agents are lining up moves, players are studying options. Dalglish has already exploded the myth that 10 years away from the frontline are enfeebling. His first move was to restore old Anfield values from before the Ben�tez and G�rard Houllier eras. His next trick will be to move with the times. Signing Carroll and Su�rez shows he can, and will, but the owners need to tell the industry he is their man and then go out and do some business.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2011/mar/31/kenny-dalglish-liverpool

Disability Electronic music Xabi Alonso The US embassy cables St Lucia Royal Bank of Scotland

FCO travel advice mapped

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office issues travel warnings and advice for British citizens. See the snapshot they paint of the world today
? Get the data

The world is a scary place right now; what with the Japan disaster and the Arab and Middle East unrest. Where's safe to go to? Well, for British citizens, the safety of foreign countries is ranked by the Foreign & Commonwealth Office - the FCO.

The FCO regularly issues travel advice for British citizens, telling them where is safe to go. It's obviously not the only foreign office in the world to do this - the US State Department does too, for instance.

But the criteria are very different. The US issues 34 warnings for its citizens of places where

the US Government's ability to assist American citizens is constrained due to the closure of an embassy or consulate or because of a drawdown of its staff.

So, as well as dangerous places like Iraq, it includes countries like North Korea or Iran, which have no US embassy.

The UK's definition is broader. It covers 53 countries where either no travel at all or essential travel only - to the whole country or part of it - is recommended. It's all about safety. The definition means there are no restrictions on travelling to North Korea for instance - it just doesn't take account of whether or not you'll actually be able to get there.

We thought it would be interesting to take a snapshot of those ratings - reflecting the turmoil in the world today. You can see the result above using Google Fusion tables - you may be able to do better (we had problems mapping Gaza and the West Bank, for instance).

It's a fascinating picture - not only of the UK's world view - but also of conflict, disaster and terror in the world today.

There are a load of caveats. Many of the warnings are against travel to specific regions - a distinction you won't see on the map above. That includes countries like Russia, for instance - where the FCO advises against travel to regions caught up in violence, such as Chechnya or North Ossetia. The FCO also combines Israel and the Palestinian Occupied territories into one travel bulletin.

You can download the full data below. What can you do with it?

Data summary

Download the data

? DATA: download the full spreadsheet from Google Fusion tables

More data

Data journalism and data visualisations from the Guardian

World government data

? Search the world's government data with our gateway

Development and aid data

? Search the world's global development data with our gateway

Can you do something with this data?

? Flickr Please post your visualisations and mash-ups on our Flickr group
?�Contact us at data@guardian.co.uk

? Get the A-Z of data
? More at the Datastore directory

? Follow us on Twitter
? Like us on Facebook


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/mar/23/fco-travel-advice-map

Panto season US politics Liza Minnelli Allen Stanford Energy industry Office for National Statistics

The race for clean Olympic air | H�l�ne Mulholland

After the smog problems of Beijing, London has still to reach agreed air quality standards ahead of 2012

With construction on the stadium complete and plans for a blue hockey pitch unveiled, preparations to date for the 2012 Olympics appear to be running smoothly, but in the background is an issue that plagued the Beijing Games.

Poor air quality is one of the biggest public health problems facing the capital: it has the worst air quality record in Britain and ranks among the worst in Europe. Simon Birkett, founder of the Clean Air in London campaign, took early retirement two years ago to mobilise public opinion and put pressure on the London mayor and the government to clean up the air ahead of the Games.

The run-up to the 2008 Beijing Olympics was mired by negative reports about smog smothering the city. The International Olympic Committee president, Jacques Rogge, was prompted to admit a year before the Games that China's pollution problems were so dire that outdoor endurance events could be postponed if the problem continued to worsen.

The Beijing organisers took drastic measures three weeks before the Games to lift the haze of smog: banning half the city's 3.3m cars from the roads each day, depending on whether their number plates ended in an odd or even digit.

That proved insufficient so efforts were stepped up.

Although London is not on a par with the smog of Beijing, there is a pressing need to improve London's air. A report by the House of Commons environmental audit committee concluded last year that poor air quality made asthma worse, exacerbated heart disease and respiratory illness, and "probably causes more mortality and morbidity than passive smoking, road traffic accidents or obesity".

Figures published last year by city hall revealed 4,300 premature deaths were caused by poor air quality in London in 2008. Boris Johnson, the mayor of London, who has done so much championing of the Games, is under pressure because of his statutory duty to deliver an air quality strategy for the capital.

Thanks to London, the UK is in breach of an air quality standard set in 2005. A second written warning from the European Commission, issued last year, concentrated minds and the UK won an extension to meet the standard for limit values for PM10s ? dangerous airborne particles that contribute to thousands of premature deaths.

This month the commission granted the UK an extension because the commission's environment commissioner, Janez Potocnik, believed government had successfully demonstrated that the UK would reach compliance.

But because this was projected to be met within a "very narrow margin", the extension was agreed on condition that the London air quality plan is revised by June and submitted to the commission for scrutiny by November this year.

Johnson maintains that the measures in his air quality strategy were not all included in the official submission to Europe, and that once these are presented as the action plan the commission will be satisfied and London will not reach the stage where cars have to be ordered off the road in pollution hotspots.

Let's hope this race is won so that athletes and spectators breathe in cleaner air next year at what the government promised would be the greenest ever Games.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/london-2012-olympics-blog/2011/mar/30/olympics-london-2012-air-pollution-boris

North and Central America Madeleine McCann Nicolas Anelka Virginia Manchester United Chamonix

Gas emissions reduced by changing farm animal diet says study

Research shows how to reduce the amount of methane produced by cows and sheep belching and breaking wind

A change of diet could help flatulent farm animals reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, a study has said.

Government funded research aimed at helping farmers cut their contribution to climate change shows how to reduce the amount of methane produced by cows and sheep belching and breaking wind.

Researchers at Reading University and the Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences found that dairy cows could emit 20% less methane for every litre of milk if fed crushed rapeseed.

Increasing the proportion of maize silage in cows' diets from 25% to 75% could reduce methane emission by 6% per litre of milk, while high-sugar grasses could reduce an animal's methane emissions by 20% for every kilo of weight gain. And a diet including a particular variety of oat could cut sheep's methane emissions by a third, the researchers said.

Agriculture minister Jim Paice said: "It is very exciting that this new research has discovered that by simply changing the way we feed farm animals we have the potential to make a big difference to the environment."

Agriculture contributes about 9% of all UK greenhouse gas emissions, according to the Department of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), with half of this coming from sheep, cows and goats.

Farming has been shown to account for 41% of the UK's overall methane emissions.

A Defra spokesman added: "In the longer term the benefits gained by changing animals' diets will need to be considered against other environmental impacts as well as how practical or costly they are for the farming industry to implement."


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/mar/30/gas-emissions-reduced-animal-diet

Darren Bent Credit crunch Sheffield United London Stoke City Wigan Athletic

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Japan's battle to save reactors is lost

The firm's chairman said it had 'no choice' but to scrap reactors No 1-4, but held out hope that the remaining two could continue to operate

Japanese officials have conceded that the battle to salvage four crippled reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi power plant has been lost.

The plant's operator, Tokyo Electric Power [Tepco], said the reactors would be scrapped, and warned that the operation to contain the nuclear crisis, now well into its third week, could last months.

Tepco's announcement came as new readings showed a dramatic increase in radioactive contamination in the sea near the atomic complex.

The firm's chairman, Tsunehisa Katsumata, said it had "no choice" but to scrap the Nos 1-4 reactors, but held out hope that the remaining two could continue to operate. It is the first time the company has conceded that the at least part of the plant will have to be decommissioned.

But the government's chief spokesman, Yukio Edano, repeated an earlier call for all six reactors at the 40-year-old plant to be decommissioned. "It is very clear looking at the social circumstances," he said.

Tens of thousands of people living near the plants have been evacuated or ordered to stay indoors, while the plant has leaked radioactive materials in to the sea, soil and air.

On Thursday, the International Atomic Energy Agency [IAEA] suggested widening the 30-kilometre exclusion zone around the plant after finding that radiation levels at a village 40 kilometres from the plant exceeded the criteria for evacuation.

"We have advised [Japanese officials] to carefully assess the situation, and they have indicated that it is already under assessment," Denis Flory, a deputy director of the IAEA, said.

The French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, was due to arrive in Tokyo on Thursday to show support for the Fukushima operation and for talks with his Japanese counterpart, Naoto Kan. Sarkozy, the current G8 chair, is the first foreign leader to visit Japan since the 11 March earthquake and tsunami.

An emotional Kastumata apologised for the anxiety the crisis has caused.

"We apologise for causing the public anxiety, worry and trouble due to the explosions at reactor buildings and the release of radioactive materials," he told reports in Tokyo late on Wednesday. "Our greatest responsibility is to do everything to bring the current situation to an end and under control."

He said the "dire situation" at the plant was likely to continue for some time.

The pressure to make progress also took its toll on Tepco's chief executive, Masataka Shimizu, who is in hospital being treated for exhaustion.

The country's nuclear and industrial safety agency, Nisa, said on Thursday radioactive iodine at 4,385 times the legal limit had been identified in the sea near the plant, although officials have yet to determine how it got there. On Wednesday the measurement had been 3,355 times the legal limit.

Hidehiko Nishiyama, a Nisa spokesman, said fishing had stopped in the area, adding that the contamination posed no immediate threat to humans. "We will find out how it happened and do our utmost to prevent it from rising," he said.

The government's acceptance of help from the US and France has strengthened the belief that the battle to save the stricken reactors is lost.

On Tuesday, a US engineer who helped install reactors at the plant said he believed the radioactive core in unit 2 may have melted through the bottom of its containment vessel and on to a concrete floor.

While Nisa officials attempted to play down the contamination's impact on marine life, any development that heightens health concerns among consumers will dismay local fishermen, many of whom already face a long struggle to rebuild their businesses after the 11 March earthquake and tsunami.

Experts say the radiation will be diluted by the sea, lessening the contamination of fish and other marine life.

Robert Peter Gale, a US medical researcher who was brought in by Soviet authorities after the Chernobyl disaster, said recent higher readings of radioactive iodine-131 and caesium-137 should be of greater concern than reports earlier this week of tiny quantities of plutonium found in soil samples.

But he added: "It's obviously alarming when you talk about radiation, but if you have radiation in non-gas form I would say dump it in the ocean."

Gale, who has been advising the Japanese government, said: "To some extent that's why some nuclear power plants are built along the coast, to be in an area where the wind is blowing out to sea, and because the safest way to deposit radiation is in the ocean.

"The dilutional factor could not be better - there's no better place. If you deposit it on earth or in places where people live there is no dilutional effect. From a safety point of view the ocean is the safest place."

Criticism of Tepco is building after safety lapses last week put three workers in hospital - all have been discharged - and erroneous reports of radiation data.

Shimizu, 66, has not been seen since appearing at a press conference on 13 March, two days after the disaster.

He had reportedly resumed control of the operation at the firm's headquarters in Tokyo after suffering a minor illness, but on Tuesday he was admitted to hospital suffering from high blood pressure and dizziness. Tepco said on Wednesday that he was not expected to be absent for long.

The hundreds of workers at the plant must now find a balance between pumping enough water to cool the reactors and avoiding a runoff of highly radioactive excess water. As yet they do not have anywhere to store the contaminated water.

The options under consideration were to transfer the water to a ship or cover the reactors to trap radioactive particles, Edano said.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/31/japan-battle-save-nuclear-reactors-failed

Internet Chelsea Consumer affairs Coronation Street Ireland bailout Waste

Onagawa: Japanese tsunami town where nuclear plant is the safest place

Hundreds of survivors shelter next door to power station reactors in stark contrast to Fukushima disaster 75 miles away

As a tsunami ravaged the Japanese fishing town of Onagawa hundreds of residents fled for the safest place they knew: the local nuclear power plant.

More than two weeks later 240 remain, watching TV or playing ball games with their children in a building next to three atomic reactors. It's a startling contrast to the damaged Fukushima nuclear plant 75 miles south-east, where radiation leaks have forced an evacuation of area residents and terrified the nation.

The town of Onagawa's embrace of its plant reflects the mindset in much of Japan, at least before the crisis. Nuclear power was accepted as a trade-off: clean and reliable energy versus the tiny but real risk of catastrophe as is unfolding at the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant.

It is unclear how strongly the country will back nuclear energy in the future. But in Onagawa, as in much of the country, there may be few realistic alternatives. "I'm very happy here, everyone is grateful to the power company," said Mitsuko Saito, 63, whose house was levelled in the tsunami. "It's very clean inside. We have electricity and nice toilets."

Those sheltering at the plant live in relative luxury compared with many other survivors. Most of Onagawa is still covered in a thick layer of dust. There is no running water or mobile phone service and only a few neighbourhoods have electricity. Nearly 1,100 of the 10,000 residents are dead or missing and 5,500 more have moved into schools and civic centres.

Within the nuclear plant facilities are pristine, electricity flows directly from Japan's national grid and evacuees can use its dedicated phone network to make calls.

"The general public isn't normally allowed inside but in this case we felt it was the right thing to do," said company spokesman Yoshitake Kanda.

The plant has heavily guarded entrances and strict security checkpoints. Operator Tohoku Electric Power has barred reporters from the grounds. Many of the details for this article were gathered from employees and evacuees as they passed through the front gate.

After the tsunami hit residents made their way to a company public relations centre on high ground just outside the main nuclear complex. That facility was damaged and had no water or power, so they were moved to a meeting room inside the complex ? and eventually to the employee gym, where they now stay, near the reactors.

With coastal roads impassable the company flew in water and food by helicopter from Sendai city, about 40 miles south. The gym, the size of two basketball courts, housed 360 people at its peak, about a third of the number crammed into other buildings of that size in the area.

"It's pretty spread out. People are just kind of lying around and relaxing," said Tatsuya Abe, 29, who is staying at the plant with his wife and three-year-old daughter. "There are a lot of aftershocks but it's safe."

The Onagawa plant was built to withstand nine metre high tsunamis compared with Fukushima's 5.4 metre limit. It had only light damage, including a fire near a turbine and some water that splashed out of a fuel rods pool. A jump in radioactivity was attributed to leaks from Fukushima.

A billboard posted by a protest group near the entrance road to the plant reads: "Eliminate nuclear power! Will it stop because of an accident or because we stop it together?"

But resource-poor Japan will struggle to find alternatives to nuclear energy, which it relies on for 30% of its electricity.

"If we get too sensitive it'll bring us down," said Masuo Takahashi, 84, from a nearby shelter in Onagawa. "So we just have to trust that there won't be an accident like Fukushima here."


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/30/onagawa-tsunami-refugees-nuclear-plant

Science fiction The Archers China Radio industry Mortgages Real estate

How credit card companies want to debit you | Dean Baker

If Visa and MasterCard succeed in overturning regulation of debit card charges, the prospects for financial reform are bleak

Would you like to increase the sales tax in order to pay the banks another $12bn a year in profits?

That is the issue that is being debated in Washington, these days. In case you missed it, this is because the issue is usually not discussed in these terms. The immediate issue is the fee that credit card companies are allowed to charge on debit card transactions.

We have two credit companies, Visa and MasterCard, who comprise almost the entire market. This gives them substantial bargaining power. Few retailers could stay in business if they did not accept both cards. Visa and MasterCard have taken advantage of their position to mark up their fees far above their costs. This is true with both their debit and their credit cards, but the issue is much simpler with a debit card.

While a credit card carries some risk because some of the debt incurred will not be paid, a debit card is paid off in full with an electronic fund transfer at the time of the purchase. The credit card company only carries the risk of errors in payment or fraud. While these costs are quite small, the credit companies take advantage of their bargaining power to charge debit cards fees in the range of 1-2% of the sale price. They share this money with the banks that are part of their networks.

This fee is, in effect, a sales tax. Since the credit companies generally do not allow retailers to offer cash discounts, they must mark up the sales price for all customers by enough to cover the cost of the fee. This seems especially unfair to the cash customers, since they must pay a higher price for the items they buy ? even though they are not getting the convenience of paying with a debit or credit card. Those paying in cash also tend to be poorer than customers with debit or credit cards, which means that this is a transfer from low- and moderate-income customers to the banks.

This is where financial reform comes in. One of the provisions of the Dodd-Frank bill passed last year instructed the Federal Reserve Board to determine the actual cost of carrying through a debit card transfer and to regulate fees accordingly. The Fed determined that a fee of 10-12 cents per transaction should be sufficient to cover the industry's costs and provide a normal profit. The Fed plans to limit the amount that the credit card companies can charge retailers to this level.

This would save retailers approximately $12bn a year, at the expense of the credit card companies and the banks that are part of their networks. The prospect of losing $12bn in annual profits has sent the industry lobbyists into high gear. They have developed a range of bad things that will happen if the regulated fee structure takes effect and also argued that big retailers would be the only ones benefiting.

On the list of bad things that will happen, the banks are claiming that they will deny debit cards to many people who now have them and start charging for services like maintaining current accounts. While banks may cut back some services in response to this loss of profits, if we want to see these services subsidised, it would make more sense to subsidise them directly, rather than allow banks effectively to impose a sales tax for this purpose.

The argument that retailers will just pocket the savings ? instead of passing it on to consumers ? is laughable, since it comes from people who were big advocates of recent US trade agreements. Their argument in that context is that lower cost imports from Mexico, China and other developing countries will mean lower prices for consumers. It can't be the case that competition forces retailers to pass on savings on imported goods but not savings on bank fees. In reality, the savings will not be immediately and fully passed on to consumers, but it is likely that most of it will be passed on over time, just as has been the case with lower priced imported goods.

The credit card industry and the banks really don't have a case here; they are just hoping that they can rely on their enormous political power to overturn this part of the financial reform bill. If they succeed, then the bill will have even less impact that even the sceptics expected.

The industry is already aggressively working to weaken all the important provisions of the bill. There are more and more exceptions being invented to the Volcker rule that limited the ability of government insured banks to engage in speculative trading. The industry is also trying to expand the list of exemptions from rules requiring derivatives to be traded through clearing houses. And it is rebelling against the requirement that financial institutions maintain a plan for their own resolution.

In these cases and others the industry will raise, it certainly has a better argument than it does on debit card fees. Brushing away their rationalisations, their argument here is that they want larger profits and they have political power to get them. That may turn out to be true.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://feeds.guardian.co.uk/~r/theguardian/commentisfree/rss/~3/QDrYB3MAhug/banking-creditcards

Chamonix Russia Tony Cottee Taxonomy Sunderland Recession

'I love you' the Liz Taylor way

The Hollywood star married eight times, so her grand gestures of love obviously didn't last. Have you had good love go bad?

It was a declaration of undying love as strong as any. "I've never known this kind of love before, it's so perfect and mature," wrote the 17-year-old Elizabeth Taylor to her then fiance, the 28-year-old William Pawley, in a series of 60 love letters now to be auctioned off in May. "I've never loved anyone in my life before one-third as much as I love you, and I never will." But despite the power of the sentiment it was not to last, with the engagement ending after less than a year.

Pawley was, of course, not the last man to suffer from Taylor's serial monogamy, with the Hollywood star marrying eight times in her life. Nor was he the first in any relationship to have believed the grand gestures of a lover: from Jane Austen's Willoughby and Dashwood to Katie Price and Peter Andre, who recorded their own version of Endless Love before their very public break-up, the history of romance is often one of broken promises.

When have you believed the words of your lover only to be let down at a later date? Have you ever made such grand statements and retracted them to the sound of a broken heart? Is it a case of the folly of young love, or have instances such as this happened to you throughout your romantic life?


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://feeds.guardian.co.uk/~r/theguardian/commentisfree/rss/~3/vy9P38TiwA4/love-liz-taylor-open-thread

Global economy Crime Celestine Babayaro North Korea Clint Eastwood European banks

All the day's Money stories


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/all

Eric Cantona John Barnes Inflation Sevilla Motoring Restaurants

Cuts protest: I'm a political prisoner now

Why was I jailed with other peaceful UK Uncut supporters arrested at Fortnum & Mason? We'd messed with the rich, apparently

On the day of the anti-cuts march the comedian Josie Long tweeted: "UK Uncut is about fun and peaceful protest." It's the same fun and peaceful protest that historically earned the group praise from the Daily Mail, celebrity fans from Radiohead to Duncan Bannatyne, and participants aged from three to 83. It is also the reason that I am proud to have attended numerous UK Uncut protests, from those that transformed Boots stores into hospitals to those that opened schools in Lloyds TSB. I've seen my fellow protesters bring along children, grandchildren, parents, friends and colleagues.

The occupation of Fortnum & Mason on 26 March was no different, as footage of the protest demonstrates. Despite this, and despite the police in the store praising the protest as "sensible", we were dragged away, arrested and taken to police stations around London. One of the protesters was 15 years old.

That protester, like me and many others, was locked in a cell for nearly 24 hours on the basis of evidence that was never presented to solicitors ? solicitors who were not contacted until the next morning. In the early hours of the morning we were unexpectedly woken up and told to take off our clothes. When we asked why, we were simply told that the police had the right to seize our clothes and would be doing so.

Mobile phones were taken along with DNA samples and fingerprints (a right of the police following arrest), despite the fact that not a single protester was charged with a violent offence, or damage to property. The 15-year-old was kept on watch by police due to anxiety. She was so distressed that when she ate, she threw up on herself. When she left the police station, she was asked to confirm that the Met could not be held responsible for her suicide.

A very senior officer in my station admitted to my parents that he regretted having to charge the protesters on the orders of Scotland Yard: he said they all seemed like "nice people", and that he suspected the charges were politically motivated. These sentiments were echoed by other officers who kept distinguishing us from "proper criminals". Another senior officer told me he suspected that it wasn't so much a case of legality, but that UK Uncut had upset people who were that little bit too rich; that little bit too powerful. Some police officers, I've been told, even advised protesters about constructing a defence.

It's a funny world we live in where people are dragged to jail cells for protesting peacefully, while one Bullingdon Club member can boast about spending a night in the cells and go on to become mayor of London. Even funnier that the police, who are also facing cuts, should reluctantly arrest protesters they apparently perceive to be peaceful. But it all boils down to one simple message from the government, summed up appropriately by a lyric from UK Uncut fans Radiohead: "This is what you get when you mess with us."

It's no coincidence that the majority of arrestees were affiliated to a movement that has gained phenomenal popular support, necessitated an investigation by the National Audit Office, and has prompted Whitehall to hold additional PR training. The government, it seems, is unfazed by protests ? unless they look like they are working. I am reminded of an observation the anarchist Emma Goldman once made about democracy: "If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal."

In the end, that's what Saturday's events were all about: democracy. This is not about the politics of right and left ? this is the politics of right and wrong. We all have a right to participate in our democracy, a fundamental part of which is peaceful protest. It is distressing and disappointing to witness the unfolding media narrative, in which my actions have been confused with those of groups whose tactics I have no interest in adopting.

You may agree with what your government is doing now, but that might not always be the case. One day, the government might do something that you consider morally wrong, or an infringement of your rights. If that day comes, will you simply wait four years to put a cross on a piece of paper? Or will you make your voice heard?

If the answer is the latter, I hope that you won't be put off supporting UK Uncut, regardless of your politics; because if there's one thing that Saturday has taught us, it's just how easily questioning the government can land you in a cell.

Imogen Perry is a pseudonym for an anti-cuts activist


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://feeds.guardian.co.uk/~r/theguardian/commentisfree/rss/~3/99byn9cKbiI/police-uk-uncut

Classical music Digital media Foreign currency David Lynch Foreign policy Sweden

Tesla sues Top Gear over 'faked' race

Car-maker to sue BBC for libel and malicious falsehood as faked race continues to be shown uncorrected on repeats and DVD

Electric sports car maker Tesla Motors is sueing the BBC's Top Gear TV programme for allegedly faking a scene showing the company's Roadster car running out of electricity and slowing to a halt in a race.

The legal move is the culmination of a row that has rumbled on between the show and Telsa since the episode was first broadcast in 2008. Specialist libel law firm Carter-Ruck issued the writ on behalf of the firm on Tuesday at the high court because the scene was still being shown onworldwide repeats and was available on DVD, and the BBC had failed to correct it. The firm expects to recover not more than �100,000 in damages.

In the race with a petrol-powered Lotus Elise, the �87,000 electric car was shown having to stop for a recharge. But the car never ran out of electricity.

Tesla said after the race aired that neither of the two Roadsters that it loaned Jeremy Clarkson's team had gone below 20% of charge.

Earlier in the same episode, Clarkson had praised the Tesla: "I cannot believe this ? that's biblically quick. This car is electric, literally. The top speed may only be 125mph but there's so much torque it does 0-60 in 3.9 seconds. Not bad from a motor the size of a watermelon and which has only one moving part."

Tesla is sueing the show for libel and malicious falsehood, and says the show misrepresented the car's true range ? claiming 55 miles rather than 211 ? and that claims a second Roadster on loan had broken brakes was untrue.

In a statement, the California-based company, whose first cars were based on British-made Lotuses, said: "Tesla simply wants Top Gear to stop rebroadcasting this malicious episode and to correct the record, but they've repeatedly ignored Tesla's requests."

A Top Gear spokeswoman said: "We can confirm that we have received notification that Tesla have issued proceedings against the BBC. The BBC stands by the programme and will be vigorously defending this claim"

On Monday Tesla, which plans to introduce a cheaper "Model S" car next year, said the 1,500 Roadsters it had sold since 2008 had collectively saved over 2,404 tonnes of CO2 emissions. Top Gear magazine, which is separate from the TV show, has also been critical of previous electric cars, and in 2007 released shocking images of a G-Wiz crash-tested at 40mph.

But analysts have predicted 2011 will be a "breakthrough" year for the vehicles, which became eligible a �5,000 government grant in January. Last week, the first few hundred Nissan Leafs, the UK's first mass-produced electric car, were delivered to customers. Unlike the Tesla Roadster, the Leaf is limited to around 110 miles and 90mph. A new generation of around 10 different electric and plug-in hybrid cars are expected in the UK by the end of 2012.

Separately on Wednesday, green group WWF released a report warning that the UK will needs millions of electric vehiclesto meet its carbon targets. Around 1.7m will be needed by 2020 and 6.4m by 2030, it said, in an echo of calls by government watchdog the Committee on Climate Change for a similar number to meet the target of cutting greenhouse gases emissions 80% by 2050.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/mar/30/tesla-sue-top-gear

Italy Petrol prices West Bromwich Albion Manchester City Milan Baros Alexander McCall Smith

John le Carr� turns down Booker honour

Doyen of spy fiction asks to be removed from shortlist for Man Booker International prize as he 'doesn't compete for awards'

John le Carr� has been nominated for the Man Booker International prize, which recognises an author's lifetime contribution to fiction, but the British writer has asked to be taken off the shortlist as he "doesn't compete for literary awards".

Le Carr�, the author of more than 20 books that helped define the spy genre in fiction and film, including The Spy Who Came in from the Cold and The Constant Gardener, was among 13 writers named as finalists.

The �60,000 prize is awarded every two years to a living writer for overall contribution to fiction. It is connected to, but separate from, the better-known Man Booker prize for fiction, which is awarded each year to a specific book.

A panel of three judges chooses writers to be considered for the award, then selects a shortlist and finally a winner.

"I am enormously flattered to be named as a finalist of the 2011 Man Booker International prize," Le Carr� said in a statement issued through his publishers "However, I do not compete for literary prizes and have therefore asked for my name to be withdrawn."

Rick Gekoski, the chairman of the judging panel, respectfully declined the request.

"John le Carr�'s name will, of course, remain on the list. We are disappointed that he wants to withdraw from further consideration because we are great admirers of his work," Gekoski said.

Other finalists include American Philip Roth, Australia's David Malouf and Indian-born Canadian writer Rohinton Mistry. Two Chinese authors, Wang Anyi and Su Tong, are also on the list.

Previous winners include Alice Munro, Chinua Achebe and Ismail Kadare.

The 2011 winner will be announced on 18 May in Sydney.

The prize is sponsored by Man Group PLC, which also funds the annual fiction prize.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/mar/30/john-le-carre-booker-honour

Yorkshire Sepp Blatter Local government Radio 1 Tim Cahill Pakistan cricket betting scandal

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Website blocking will not solve copyright concerns | Jim Killock

Heavy-handed enforcement of copyright is not the answer when your real goal is to persuade people to pay for online services

Website blocking is on the agenda again, this time in relation to copyright infringement. As reported in the Guardian last week, a government-led working group ? including ministers and parties such as the BPI and Google ? is to be formed to try to find a way of blocking websites that allegedly help people download songs or films without permission, avoiding potential litigation.

While that might instantly conjure up Pirate Bay or Limewire in your mind, it could also include any site that hosts user-generated content, including services such as Rapidshare or Vimeo.

Accurately distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate content generally needs to be done by a court. After all, no web service can police all of its users all of the time, and complaints from copyright holders are not enough to establish that a service is really trying to encourage infringement.

Nevertheless, during the dying days of the Labour government, provisions in the Digital Economy Act to create powers to block websites suspected of copyright infringement were rushed through, throwing up fears of widespread and unfair website blocking. Even Yahoo, Google and Facebook were concerned. Now that the act's measures are under threat from legal action and long delays, rights holders are back lobbying for more government action.

These groups capture headlines with claims of the massive costs of peer-to-peer file sharing. It has been reported that $1.5bn is lost to illicit downloads. However, academic studies almost universally contest these figures, such as the latest analysis by LSE, which argues that the recession and the decline of CDs as a format are the key factors troubling the music industry. Other industries, notably games and films, are doing remarkably well and are not impacted in the same way by the shift to digital.

My organisation ? the Open Rights Group ? has discussed the difficulties of website blocking with Ofcom. We pointed out how easy it was for individuals to circumvent or for sites to move their URLs. Richard Clayton also outlined the Darwinian principle at play: once you put some sort of block in place, you create an incentive for someone to design an easy way around it, which will inevitably spread.

Heavy-handed enforcement of copyright is not the answer when your real goal is to persuade people to buy digital goods and services. To encourage people to part with their money, you have to demonstrate that you have a service worth paying for ? as Spotify, Lovefilm or iTunes already do.

Website blocking can only legitimately be put in place with thorough judicial processes. Voluntary or expedited procedures risk blocking the wrong sites, being used to censor people and creating unfair means for organisations to stop competitors from trading on the web.

And new powers for blocking are being advanced despite relatively balanced ones already existing. These existing powers do not seek to pass the risks of legal costs on to internet service providers, they make sure that copyright holders show infringement is knowingly taking place, and they do not expect services to be responsible for everything their users might do.

People should ask their MPs why website blocking is being advanced, what evidence there is to prioritise it over other policies and what consideration is being given to the potential impact on freedom of speech and due process.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Source: http://feeds.guardian.co.uk/~r/theguardian/commentisfree/rss/~3/i851KpeK5QE/website-blocking-copyright-online

Allen Stanford Energy industry Office for National Statistics Property Boxing Poland